Skeleton programme
ATTENTION! Please note that the times for day 2 have changed slightly
|
|
Detailed programme
For presenters: presentations in the panel sessions are 35 minutes each: ca. 15 minutes for presentation and 20 minutes for discussion.
The (final) detailed programme will be included in the conference brochure. If you prefer another version for readability, please contact us via [email protected].
The (final) detailed programme will be included in the conference brochure. If you prefer another version for readability, please contact us via [email protected].
Confirmed participants in alphabetical order
Please click the name to download abstract and author information.
Please appreciate that we cannot include this information in physical copy in the conference brochure.
Please appreciate that we cannot include this information in physical copy in the conference brochure.
- Lauren Abruzzo (University of Birmingham): Against commercial surrogacy: A gender and sexualities perspective
- Shai Agmon (Tel Aviv University): Wealthy thumbs on the scales of justice: A normative analysis of the market of legal representation in the adversarial legal system
- Roberta Astolfi (Georg August University Gottingen): Between populism and technocracy: The impoverishment of the individual's role in its relations with politics
- Didem Aydurmus (working for MEP Stefan Bernhard Eck): Democracy's plight in a limited world - An unconventional perspective
- Dawei Bao (Zhejiang University): The yoke of liberty in an era of crisis: The production of otherness and hate speech
- Mitsy Barriga-Ramos (Free University Berlin): The dynamics of social exclusion
- Eilidh Beaton (University of Pennsylvania): Providing refuge in contexts of ambivalence and hostility
- Paul Dale (University of Birmingham): Does the ICC have the jurisdiction over jus ad bellum proportionality and in turn the legality of a war?
- Lisa Diependaele (Ghent University): On rights and wrongs: The right to exclude in international law
- Ralph Early (University of Birmingham): Could Brexit risk UK consumers’ right to high quality, safe food
- Dimitrios Efthymiou (Goethe-University Frankfurt): EU immigration and welfare rights: Three normative perspectives
- Lior Erez (Tel Aviv University): Cosmopolitanism for the unconvinced
- Carl Fox (University of Leeds): Stability and the public sphere
- Philipp Gisbertz (Georg August University Gottingen): Just war theory between morality and law
- Tom Godfrey (University of Sussex): Reviving a liberal consensus: The role of contextualism in modernising political liberalism
- Tom Grimwood (University of Cumbria): The politics of irony in a post-liberal world
- Chase Halsne (Georgia State University): The limits of liberalism: A case study of Muslims in America
- Mai Hamed (University of Birmingham): Can Islamic finance inform a post-liberal debate on distributive justice?
- Johann Jakob Häußermann (Fraunhofer Center for Responsible Research and Innovation): Fairness in International Trade Policy: Equality and Differential Treatment in Theory and Practice
- Jeremy Kidwell (University of Birmingham): Crypto-currency and anarcho-crypto-capitalism: has technology made Anarchism a feasible political option (at last)?
- Kathryn MacKay (Lancaster University): Truth, trust and propaganda in public health: Considering government health campaigns
- Brian Milstein (Goethe University Frankfurt): Democratic Orders of Justification and the New Politics of Legitimation Crises
- Erica Nieblas (University of Colorado, Boulder): Gender, migration policy and the open borders debate
- Davide Pala (University of Rijeka): Experts, good citizens, democratic public debates and global warming
- Ricardo Parellada (Complutense University of Madrid): Policy coherence and world poverty
- Stefan Pedersen (University of Leeds): Liberalism without nationalism: Time to separate the wheat from the chaff?
- Katarina Pitasse Fragoso & Pedro Lippmann (Universite Catholique de Louvain and Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, respectively): Empowering poor women: the case for a feminist participatory approach to anti-poverty policies
- Dieter Quick (University of Birmingham): Pentecostal spirit-baptism as counter-neoliberal identity-formation: A Foucauldian analysis
- Andrew Reid (University of Birmingham): Can political liberalism respond to contemporary populism?
- Pärttyli Rinne (Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University): Love in global politics: A Kantian reworking of Rawls and Nussbaum
- Clara Sandelind (University of Sheffield): Coercion, legitimacy and democracy in the international refugee regime
- Laura Santi Amantini (University of Genoa): Populist anti-immigrant sentiments taken seriously: A realistic approach
- Ted Schrecker (Newcastle University): Is Trump only the beginning? A depressive realist view of the political future
- Sara Van Goozen (University of York): The moral relevance of combatants' consent
- Asaf Wiener (Tel Aviv University): Media law and policy in a post-liberal democracy: Reshaping free speech jurisprudence with political theory and social sciences
- Paula Zoido-Oses (University of Warwick): Beyond irony: Using hermeneutics to make sense of Rorty's liberal project in the age of value-pluralism